4.7 Article

Determination of the rheological behavior and thermophysical properties of malbec grape juice concentrates (Vitis vinifera)

期刊

FOOD RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL
卷 137, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodres.2020.109431

关键词

Rheology; Activation energy; Chaptalization; Density; Specific heat; Thermal conductivity

资金

  1. Coordenacao de Aperfeicoamento de Pessoal de Nivel Superior - Brasil (CAPES) [001]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The rheological behavior and thermophysical properties (density, specific heat, and thermal conductivity) were experimentally determined as function of temperature (1-66 degrees C) and solid soluble content (13.6-45.0 degrees Brix) for Malbec grape juice aiming at designing the unit operations involved in beverage industries. Mathematical modeling was performed to provide valuable information about the rheological behavior and thermophysical properties of Malbec grape juice at different concentrations and temperatures. The Ostwald-de Waele model fitted the concentrates rheological behavior with high accuracy. The consistency coefficients were significantly reduced by the temperature increase, following an Arrhenius relationship with activation energy ranging from 11.02 kJ/mol (45.0 degrees Brix) to 11.54 kJ/mol (21.0 degrees Brix). In contrast, they were increased by the higher concentration levels, ranging from 0.2044 Pa.sn (13.6 degrees Brix, 6 degrees C) to 20.9451 Pa.sn (45.0 degrees Brix, 1 degrees C). The flow behavior index was not influenced by temperature; however, it was strictly related to the concentration, assuming shear-thinning behavior (0.96 < n < 0.54), regardless of the solid soluble contents. Density, specific heat, and thermal conductivity were significantly correlated with both the temperature and concentration parameters by second-order polynomial models. The obtained results can be suitable for the potential use of Malbec juice concentrate as a chaptalization agent in winemaking and grape juice production.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据