4.6 Article

mTORC1 activation contributes to autophagy inhibition via its recruitment to lysosomes and consequent lysosomal dysfunction in cadmium-exposed rat proximal tubular cells

期刊

JOURNAL OF INORGANIC BIOCHEMISTRY
卷 212, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jinorgbio.2020.111231

关键词

Cadmium; Autophagy; mTORC1; Lysosome; Kidney; rPT cells

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31873030]
  2. Youth Innovation and Technology Program in Colleges and Universities of Shandong Province [2020KJF009]
  3. Funds of Shandong Double Tops Program

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Autophagy dysregulation is implicated in cadmium (Cd)-induced nephrotoxicity. The mammalian target of rapamycin complex 1 (mTORC1) is a negative regulator of autophagy, but its role in Cd-induced autophagy inhibition and possible regulatory mechanisms remains poorly understood. In the present study, Cd exposure activated mTORC1 in primary rat proximal tubular (rPT) cells, and two mTORC1 inhibitors (rapamycin and torin 1) were separately utilized to inhibit Cd-induced mTORC1 activation. Data showed that Cd-inhibited autophagic flux was markedly restored by two mTORC1 inhibitors, respectively, as evidenced by immunoblot analysis of autophagy marker proteins and tandem red fluorescent protein-green fluorescent protein-microtubule associated protein light chain 3 (RFP-GFP-LC3) fluorescence microscopy assay. Importantly, Cd exposure triggered the recruitment of mTORC1 onto lysosome membrane assessed by immunofluorescence co-localization analysis, which was obviously inhibited by rapamycin or torin 1. Moreover, Cd-induced lysosomal alkalization, suppressed vacuolar ATPases (V-ATPases) protein levels and impaired lysosomal degradation capacity were markedly reversed by rapamycin or torin 1. In summary, these findings demonstrate that Cd recruits mTORC1 to lysosome membrane to induce its activation, which results in lysosomal dysfunction and resultant autophagy inhibition in rPT cells.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据