4.4 Article

Simulations and Experiments Reveal Effect of Nanopores on Helium Diffusion in Quartz

期刊

ACS EARTH AND SPACE CHEMISTRY
卷 4, 期 11, 页码 1906-1912

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsearthspacechem.0c00187

关键词

helium; quartz; diffusion; density functional theory; nanopores

资金

  1. U.S. National Science Foundation (NSF)-Department of Energy (DOE) partnership for plasma science and engineering [DE-SC0016248]
  2. DOE-National Nuclear Security Administration [DE-NA0003842]
  3. University of California Laboratory Fees Research Program [LFR-17-449059]
  4. NSF Petrology and Geochemistry Program [EAR-1322086]
  5. UC Berkeley Larsen Grant
  6. Ann and Gordon Getty Foundation
  7. NSF Graduate Research Fellowship [DGE-1106400]
  8. SAGES Small Grant Scheme [1986738]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The diffusion properties of noble gases in minerals are widely used to reconstruct the thermal histories of rocks. Here, we combine density functional theory (DFT) calculations with laboratory experiments to investigate controls on helium diffusion in quartz. DFT calculations for perfect alpha-quartz predict substantially lower activation energies and frequency factors for helium diffusion than observed in laboratory experiments, especially in the [001] direction. These results imply that no helium could be retained in quartz at Earth surface temperatures, which conflicts with observations of partial cosmogenic He-3 retention over geologic time scales. Here, we implement a model of helium diffusion in alpha-quartz modulated by nanopore defects that disrupt energetically favorable diffusion pathways. In this model, we find that laboratory-determined diffusivities can be most closely reproduced when a helium atom encounters similar to 70 nanopore sites per million interstitial sites. The results of our model indicate that diffusion of helium in natural quartz, like other noble gases in other minerals, can be significantly modulated by extended defects.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据