4.5 Article

Effect of Surface State on DC Breakdown of LDPE Films

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TDEI.2017.006453

关键词

Space charge; surface state; ozone; trap; breakdown; LDPE

资金

  1. China National Funds for International (regional) projects of corporation and exchange [51161130524]
  2. National Basic Research Program of China (973 Program) [2015CB251003]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Interface between the metal electrode and insulating material affects dielectric performance of the whole insulating system significantly. In this study, low density polyethylene (LDPE) films were treated in ozone atmosphere for different time duration to investigate the effect of interface state on breakdown performance. Fourier transform infrared spectra (FT-IR) results show that carbonyl group (C=O) is introduced into the surface of LDPE film after ozone treatment, and the amount of C=O groups increases when the ozone oxidation time extends. Surface trap distribution characterized by surface potential decay (SPD) reveals that two hole-type traps exist in the surface of LDPE and ozone treated specimens. Both trap levels become shallower and the density of deeper level traps decreases with the increasing ozone oxidation time, while that of shallower level traps increases. Space charge distribution measured by pulsed electro-acoustic (PEA) method suggests that more positive charges are injected into specimens from the anode and accumulated in the vicinity of cathode after ozone treatment. Furthermore, the dc breakdown strength declines monotonously with longer ozone treatment time, and the lowest breakdown strength of specimen occurs after 6 hours, decreasing by 26.9% compared with that of untreated LDPE. Finally, it is concluded that ozone treatment results in changing of surface chemical composition, which determines surface trap distribution (surface state), leading to the variation of charge injection and accumulation properties as well as the subsequent breakdown performance.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据