4.6 Article

Learning-Based Hierarchical Distributed HVAC Scheduling With Operational Constraints

期刊

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TCST.2017.2728004

关键词

Commercial building; heating; ventilation; air-conditioning (HVAC) system; hierarchical distributed optimization; learning-based token scheduling algorithm (LBTSA); model predictive controller (MPC)

资金

  1. Republic of Singapore's National Research Foundation
  2. Building & Construction Authority for the Green Building Innovation Cluster [NRF2015ENC-GBICRD001-057]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This investigation proposes an energy management system for large multizone commercial buildings that combines distributed optimization with the adaptive learning. While the distributed optimization provides scalability and models the fresh-air infusion as ventilation constraints, the learning algorithm simultaneously captures the influences of occupancy and user interactions. The approach employs a hierarchical architecture and uses a service-oriented framework to propose a distributed optimization method for commercial buildings. In addition, it also includes operational constraints required for optimizing the building energy consumption not studied in the literature. We show that our hierarchical architecture provides much better scalability and minimal performance loss comparable to the centralized approach. We illustrate that the influences of operational constraints on chiller, duct, damper, and ventilation are important for studying the energy savings. The energy saving potential of the proposed approach is illustrated on a 10-zone building, while its scalability is shown via simulations on a 500-zone building. To study the robustness of the approach meeting cancellations or other events that influence zone thermal dynamics, the resulting energy savings are studied. The results demonstrate the advantages of the proposed algorithm in terms of scalability, energy consumption, and robustness.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据