4.5 Article

Towards an Energy-Efficient Anomaly-Based Intrusion Detection Engine for Embedded Systems

期刊

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON COMPUTERS
卷 66, 期 1, 页码 163-177

出版社

IEEE COMPUTER SOC
DOI: 10.1109/TC.2016.2560839

关键词

Low-power design; energy-aware systems; machine learning; classifier design and evaluation; feature evaluation and selection; hardware description languages; network-level security and protection; security and privacy protection

资金

  1. Intel Labs Univ. Research Office
  2. Brazilian National Council for Scientific and Technological Development [440850/2013-4]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Nowadays, a significant part of all network accesses comes from embedded and battery-powered devices, which must be energy efficient. This paper demonstrates that a hardware (HW) implementation of network security algorithms can significantly reduce their energy consumption compared to an equivalent software (SW) version. The paper has four main contributions: (i) a new feature extraction algorithm, with low processing demands and suitable for hardware implementation; (ii) a feature selection method with two objectives-accuracy and energy consumption; (iii) detailed energy measurements of the feature extraction engine and three machine learning (ML) classifiers implemented in SW and HW-Decision Tree (DT), Naive-Bayes (NB), and k-Nearest Neighbors (kNN); and (iv) a detailed analysis of the tradeoffs in implementing the feature extractor and ML classifiers in SW and HW. The new feature extractor demands significantly less computational power, memory, and energy. Its SW implementation consumes only 22 percent of the energy used by a commercial product and its HW implementation only 12 percent. The dual-objective feature selection enabled an energy saving of up to 93 percent. Comparing the most energy-efficient SW implementation (new extractor and DT classifier) with an equivalent HW implementation, the HW version consumes only 5.7 percent of the energy used by the SW version.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据