4.6 Article

Interface Prostheses With Classifier-Feedback-Based User Training

期刊

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING
卷 64, 期 11, 页码 2575-2583

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TBME.2016.2641584

关键词

Classifier feedback; electromyography; human-machine system; hand motion; prostheses; pattern recognition (PR); user training

资金

  1. European Union [600915]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51575338, 51575407, 51475427]
  3. EPSRC [EP/G041377/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  4. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/G041377/1] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

It is evident that user training significantly affects performance of pattern-recognition-based myoelectric prosthetic device control. Despite plausible classification accuracy on offline datasets, online accuracy usually suffers from the changes in physiological conditions and electrode displacement. The user ability in generating consistent electromyographic (EMG) patterns can be enhanced via proper user training strategies in order to improve online performance. This study proposes a clustering-feedback strategy that provides real-time feedback to users by means of a visualized online EMG signal input as well as the centroids of the training samples, whose dimensionality is reduced to minimal number by dimension reduction. Clustering feedback provides a criterion that guides users to adjust motion gestures and muscle contraction forces intentionally. The experiment results have demonstrated that hand motion recognition accuracy increases steadily along the progress of the clustering-feedback-based user training, while conventional classifier-feedback methods, i.e., label feedback, hardly achieve any improvement. The result concludes that the use of proper classifier feedback can accelerate the process of user training, and implies prosperous future for the amputees with limited or no experience in pattern-recognition-based prosthetic device manipulation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据