4.6 Article

Giant piezoresistive gauge factor in vein-membrane/graphene sensors with a wide linear working range

期刊

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS CHEMISTRY C
卷 8, 期 47, 页码 16957-16966

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d0tc02930k

关键词

-

资金

  1. Chinese National Natural Science Fund [11632004, U1864208]
  2. Key Project of Natural Science Foundation of CQ CSTC [cstc2017jcyjBX0063]
  3. Key Program for International Science and Technology Cooperation Projects of the Ministry of Science and Technology of China [2016YFE0125900]
  4. National Science and Technology Major Project [2017-VII-0011-0106]
  5. Science and Technology Planning Project of Tianjin [20ZYJDJC00030]
  6. Key Program of Research and Development of Hebei Province [202030507040009]
  7. Fund for Innovative Research Groups of Natural Science Foundation of Hebei Province [A2020202002]
  8. Key Project of Natural Science Foundation of Tianjin [S20ZDF077]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Here, a piezoresistive sensor was fabricated by combining graphene and the veins of Magnolia henryi. The sensor displayed a high sensitivity, with a gauge factor of 238.09, and a wide and appropriate linear working range, with a linear coefficient of 99.4% when subjected to mechanical strain from 0% to 12%. It also showed a long-term repeatability of 0.0078% per second when subjected to 1000 cycles of periodic mechanical strain. The resistance only fluctuated between 154 ohm and 161 ohm when the environmental temperature changed from 30 degrees C to 70 degrees C. These results show that the multi-level structure of the sensor played a critical role in the piezoresistive mechanism. The performance of the developed sensor was ascribed to the veins' multi-level structure at the microscale and the doping of boron atoms from the aforementioned veins into the graphene crystal structure at the atomic scale, thereby altering the structure of its electronic energy bands and electron density. This introduced holes and formed a p-type semiconductor.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据