4.5 Article

Effect of Pheromone Blend Components, Sex Ratio, and Population Size on the Mating of Cadra cautella (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae)

期刊

JOURNAL OF INSECT SCIENCE
卷 20, 期 6, 页码 -

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/jisesa/ieaa128

关键词

Cadra cautella; sex pheromone; mating disruption; ZETA; ZTA

资金

  1. Sri Lanka Council for Agricultural Research Policy [NARP/16/RUSL/AG/01]
  2. United States Department of Agriculture (USDA), National Institute of Food and Agriculture (NIFA), Crop Protection and Pest Management (CPPM) [2017-70006-27262]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The almond moth Cadra cautella (Walker), a key pest of storage facilities, is difficult to manage using synthetic chemicals. Pheromone-based management methods remain a high priority due to advantages over conventional management practices, which typically use insecticides. Cadra cautella females release a blend of pheromone including (2, E)-9,12-tetradecadienyl acetate (ZETA) and (Z)-9-tetradecadien-1-yl acetate (ZTA). The effect of these components on mating of C. cautella and how response varies with the population density and sex ratio remain unknown. In this study, the mating status of C. cautella was studied inside mating cages under different ratios of ZETA and ZTA diluted in hexane and at different population sizes either with equal or unequal sex ratio. The lowest percentage of mated females (highest mating disruption (MDI effects), corresponding to roughly 12.5%, was produced by a 5:1 and 3.3:1 ratio of ZETA:ZTA. Populations with equal sex ratio showed the lowest percentage of mated females, at 20% and 12.5% under lower and higher density, respectively. The next lowest percentage of mated females was produced when the sex ratio was set to 1: 2 and 2:1 male:female, with just 25% and 22.5% of moths mated, respectively.This study shows that mating status of C. cautella is influenced by ZETA:ZTA ratio, sex ratio, and population size.This current knowledge would have useful implications for mating disruption programs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据