4.7 Article

Single-Layer Wideband Circularly Polarized High-Efficiency Reflectarray for Satellite Communications

期刊

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ANTENNAS AND PROPAGATION
卷 65, 期 9, 页码 4529-4538

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TAP.2017.2722824

关键词

Circular polarization; element rotation method; reflectarray; satellite communications; wideband array

资金

  1. U.K. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/N032497/1]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61372077]
  3. Science and Technology Innovation Commission of Shenzhen [ZDSYS 201507031550105]
  4. Guangdong Provincial Science and Technology Programs [2013B090200011, 2016B090918080]
  5. EPSRC [EP/P015840/1, EP/N032497/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  6. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/P015840/1, EP/N032497/1] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper presents a single-layer circularly polarized reflectarray which achieves large bandwidth (BW) in terms of axial ratio (AR), gain, aperture efficiency (AE) and radiation pattern. By using a novel wideband S-shaped phasing element, an offset-fed reflectarray with 20 degrees offset beam is designed based on the element angular rotation method. Theoretical analysis is given to analyze the effect of angular rotated elements on the performance of the reflectarray, which indicates that the AR BW of the reflectarray can exceed the AR BW of the feed horn. Furthermore, the influence of the differential spatial phase delay is analyzed quantitatively, and the performance of S-element-based reflectarrays with different aperture sizes are investigated and discussed. To verify these concepts, a 180 mm x 180 mm prototype with 15 x 15 elements is fabricated and measured. The measured results confirm that the proposed reflectarray achieves a 68.5% 3-dB AR BW (7 to 14.3 GHz) and a 47.8% 3-dB gain BW (8.6 to 14 GHz). Moreover, the AE is larger than 50% in a 33% BW and larger than 30% in a 64% BW.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据