4.6 Article

Transport properties of the organic Dirac electron system α-(BEDT-TSeF)2I3

期刊

PHYSICAL REVIEW B
卷 102, 期 23, 页码 -

出版社

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.102.235116

关键词

-

资金

  1. MEXT/JSPJ KAKENHI [19J20677, 19H01846, 15K05166]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Motivated by the insulating behavior of alpha-(BEDT-TSeF)(2)I-3 at low temperatures (T's), we first performed first-principles calculations based on the crystal structural data at 30 K under ambient pressure, and we constructed a two-dimensional effective model using maximally localized Wannier functions. As possible causes of the insulating behavior, we studied the effects of the on-site Coulomb interaction U and spin-orbit interaction (SOI) by investigating the electronic state and the transport coefficient using the Hartree approximation and the T - matrix approximation. The calculations at a finite T demonstrated that a spin-ordered massive Dirac electron (SMD) appeared due to the on-site Coulomb interaction. We had an interest in the anomalous competitive effect with U and SOI when the SMD phase is present in alpha-(BETS)(2)I-3, and we investigated these contributions to the electronic state and conductivity. The SMD is not a conventional spin order, but it exhibits the spin-valley Hall effect. Direct current resistivity in the presence of a spin order gap increased divergently and exhibited negative magnetoresistance in the low T region with decreasing T. The charge density hardly changed below and above the T at which this insulating behavior appeared. However, when considering the SOI alone, the state changed to a topological insulator phase, and the electrical resistivity is saturated by edge conduction at quite low T. When considering both the SMD and the SOI, the spin order gap was suppressed by the SOI, and gaps with different sizes opened in the left and right Dirac cones. This phase transition leads to distinct changes in microwave conductivity, such as a discontinuous jump and a peak structure.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据