4.7 Article

S-Type Locally Active Memristor-Based Periodic and Chaotic Oscillators

期刊

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TCSI.2020.3017286

关键词

Memristors; Oscillators; Mathematical model; Nonlinear dynamical systems; Integrated circuit modeling; Bifurcation; Memristor; local activity; nonlinear dynamics; chaotic circuit; Hopf bifurcation

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61801154, 61771176]
  2. Zhejiang Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China [LY20F010008]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

S-type locally-active memristor (LAM) has a great potential for brain- inspired neuromorphic computing, where the S-type LAM-based oscillator is a fundamental building block. Concerning the S-type LAM, this paper constructs a material-independent model in simple mathematical expression, which can be relatively easily analyzed. By biasing the memristor into the locally- active region, and connecting it with a capacitor, a second-order oscillator can be built. The small-signal equivalent circuit of the memristor and its frequency response are applied to determine the period oscillation frequency range and compensation capacitance. Hopf bifurcation theory is used to analyze oscillation mechanism of the second-order circuit and appropriate capacitance. By adding an extra inductor into the second-order oscillator, a novel third-order chaotic circuit is developed, where a saddle-focus is derived to create chaos. Its dynamic characteristics are investigated via Lyapunov exponents, bifurcation diagrams, dynamic route map, and so on. The local activities of the single memristor, second-order oscillator, and third-order chaotic circuit are verified through the mathematical analysis. Finally, physical circuit realizations of the S- type LAM-based oscillators, including the memristor emulator, are presented. Both simulation and experimental results demonstrate the practicability of the proposed mathematical model and the validity of the theoretical analysis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据