4.7 Article

Land use changes in the coastal zone of China's Hebei Province and the corresponding impacts on habitat quality

期刊

LAND USE POLICY
卷 99, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104957

关键词

Land use change; Habitat quality; Habitat degradation; Coastal zone; China

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41501202, 41701100]
  2. Research Fund of Hebei University of Economics and Business [2019ZD06]
  3. R&D Program of Hebei University of Economics and Business

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The coastal zone is a transition zone between land and sea, and has a high biodiversity. Land use changes in the coastal zone will inevitably have huge impacts on habitat quality and biodiversity. However, in previous researches, land use changes in the coastal zone over long time scales were usually neglected due to available data. In addition, quantitative assessment methods have not been widely used to clarify the contributions of changes in land use on changes in habitat quality. Therefore, we integrated topographic map and remote sensing data to analyze land use changes in the coastal zone of Hebei Province (CZHP) in China from 1950 to 2017. Furthermore, we used the InVEST model to evaluate the influence of land use changes on habitat quality. The results showed that dramatic land use changes occurred in the CZHP from 1950 to 2017. The areas of wetland and idle land decreased by 78.41 and 72.03 %, respectively. Substantial lands were reclaimed for as cultivated land, aquaculture, and industrial and mining land. At the same time, the areas of residential land and industrial and mining land increased by 345.63 and 975.19 %, respectively. The expansion of residential land occurred at the cost of cultivated land loss, while the increase in industrial and mining land was mainly a result of the occupation of wetland and idle land. Land use changes in the CZHP led to an obvious decrease in habitat quality, with an average decline of 37.37 % from 1950 to 2017.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据