4.7 Review

Interpreting the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire in Clinical Trials and Clinical Care JACC State-of-the-Art Review

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY
卷 76, 期 20, 页码 2379-2390

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2020.09.542

关键词

clinical care; clinical trials; KCCQ; quality of life

向作者/读者索取更多资源

To improve the patient-centeredness of care, patient-reported outcomes have been increasingly used to quantify patients' symptoms, function, and quality of life. In heart failure, the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) has been qualified by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration as a Clinical Outcome Assessment and recommended as a performance measure for quantifying the quality of care. By systematically asking the same questions reproducibly over time, the KCCQ can validly and sensitively capture the impact of heart failure on patients' lives and is strongly associated with clinical events over time. This review describes how to interpret the KCCQ, how it should be analyzed in clinical trials to maximize the interpretability of results, and how it can be used in clinical practice and population health. By providing a deeper understanding of the KCCQ, it is hoped that its use can further improve the patient-centeredness of heart failure care. (C) 2020 The Authors. Published by Elsevier on behalf of the American College of Cardiology Foundation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据