4.6 Review

Regeneration of skeletal system with genipin crosslinked biomaterials

期刊

JOURNAL OF TISSUE ENGINEERING
卷 11, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/2041731420974861

关键词

Genipin; tissue engineering; biomaterials; crosslinking; skeletal system regeneration

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81772456, 81671804, 51861145311, 82001971, 21174048]
  2. Scientific Development Program of Jilin Province [20200802008GH, 20200404202YY, 20200404140YY, 20200403088SF, 20190304123YY, 20180201041SF, 20180623050TC]
  3. Program of Jilin Provincial Health Department [2019SRCJ001, 2019SCZT001]
  4. Youth Talents Promotion Project of Jilin Province [192004]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Natural biomaterials, such as collagen, gelatin, and chitosan, are considered as promising candidates for use in tissue regeneration treatment, given their similarity to natural tissues regarding components and structure. Nevertheless, only receiving a crosslinking process can these biomaterials exhibit sufficient strength to bear high tensile loads for use in skeletal system regeneration. Recently, genipin, a natural chemical compound extracted from gardenia fruits, has shown great potential as a reliable crosslinking reagent, which can reconcile the crosslinking effect and biosafety profile simultaneously. In this review, we briefly summarize the genipin extraction process, biosafety, and crosslinking mechanism. Subsequently, the applications of genipin regarding aiding skeletal system regeneration are discussed in detail, including the advances and technological strategies for reconstructing cartilage, bone, intervertebral disc, tendon, and skeletal muscle tissues. Finally, based on the specific pharmacological functions of genipin, its potential applications, such as its use in bioprinting and serving as an antioxidant and anti-tumor agent, and the challenges of genipin in the clinical applications in skeletal system regeneration are also presented.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据