4.7 Article

Concentration Estimator of Mixed VOC Gases Using Sensor Array With Neural Networks and Decision Tree Learning

期刊

IEEE SENSORS JOURNAL
卷 17, 期 6, 页码 1884-1892

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/JSEN.2017.2653400

关键词

Classification; concentration estimation; gas sensor array; mixed gases; neural networks

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61471210, 61501271, 51472126]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Ningbo [2015A610108, 2014A610065]
  3. K. C. Wong Magna Fund, Ningbo University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper aims to estimate the concentrations of volatile organic compounds (VOCs), such as ethanol, acetone, formaldehyde, and toluene, in a quaternary mixture. In order to develop an electronic nose for practical applications, the concentrations of VOCs and their combinations in the mixture are randomly assigned. The sensor array consists of five metal oxide sensors, which are produced in a laboratory. The algorithm for the estimation of concentration is realized using a backpropagation neural network (BPNN) with two hidden layers and decision tree learning. First, the data set of the VOC mixture is divided into four subclasses based on the concentration using classification and regression trees. Second, every subclass is classified and regressed using a corresponding BPNN; furthermore, its four output nodes provide a continuous prediction of the concentration of each VOC in the mixture. A single BPNN with two hidden layers is also constructed and evaluated for the purpose of comparison. The maximum error in the concentration estimation of each VOC using the proposed method is approximately 2 ppm, and the accuracy is better than the result obtained using the single BPNN. Moreover, the relative error is less than 5% when the predicted concentration is higher than 20 ppm. This paper reports some aspects of the potential of using neural networks for quantitatively analyzing the concentrations of a VOC mixture.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据