4.6 Article

Non-Hermitian topological Mott insulators in one-dimensional fermionic superlattices

期刊

PHYSICAL REVIEW B
卷 102, 期 23, 页码 -

出版社

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.102.235151

关键词

-

资金

  1. JSPS KAKENHI [JP19K21032]
  2. NSFC [11874432]
  3. Army Research Office (ARO) [W911NF-18-1-0358]
  4. Japan Science and Technology Agency (JST) (CREST) [JPMJCR1676]
  5. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) (KAKENHI) [JP20H00134]
  6. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) (JSPS-RFBR) [JPJSBP120194828]
  7. Asian Office of Aerospace Research and Development (AOARD)
  8. Foundational Questions Institute Fund (FQXi) [FQXi-IAF19-06]
  9. NTT Research
  10. [P18023]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We study interaction-induced Mott insulators, and their topological properties in a one-dimensional non-Hermitian strongly correlated spinful fermionic superlattice system with either nonreciprocal hopping or complex-valued interaction. For the nonreciprocal hopping case, the low-energy neutral excitation spectrum is sensitive to boundary conditions, which is a manifestation of the non-Hermitian skin effect. However, unlike the single-particle case, particle density of strongly correlated system does not suffer from the non-Hermitian skin effect due to the Pauli exclusion principle and repulsive interactions. Moreover, the anomalous boundary effect occurs due to the interplay of nonreciprocal hopping, superlattice potential, and strong correlations, where some in-gap modes, for both the neutral and charge excitation spectra, show no edge excitations defined via only the right eigenvectors. We show that these edge excitations of the in-gap states can be correctly characterized by only biorthogonal eigenvectors. Furthermore, the topological Mott phase, with gapless particle excitations around boundaries, exists even for the purely imaginary-valued interaction, where the continuous quantum Zeno effect leads to the effective on-site repulsion between two-component fermions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据