4.2 Article

Charge and statistics of lattice quasiholes from density measurements: A tree tensor network study

期刊

PHYSICAL REVIEW RESEARCH
卷 2, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevResearch.2.013145

关键词

-

资金

  1. Provincia Autonoma di Trento
  2. Google via the quantum NISQ award
  3. FET-Open Grant MIR-BOSE [737017]
  4. Quantum Flagship Grant PhoQuS of the European Union [820392]
  5. BAGEP Award of the Science Academy (Turkey)
  6. DFG via TWITTER
  7. Italian PRIN 2017
  8. EU via the PASQUANS project
  9. EU via QuantERA-QTFLAG project
  10. DFG from the EU via the PASQUANS project [RI 2345/2-1]
  11. Alexander von Humboldt foundation via the FeodorLynen Research Fellowship

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We numerically investigate the properties of the quasihole excitations above the bosonic fractional Chern insulator state at filling nu = 1/2, in the specific case of the Harper-Hofstadter Hamiltonian with hard-core interactions. For this purpose, we employ a tree tensor network technique, which allows us to study systems with up to N = 18 particles on a 16 x 16 lattice and experiencing an additional harmonic confinement. First, we observe the quantization of the quasihole charge at fractional values and its robustness against the shape and strength of the impurity potentials used to create and localize such excitations. Then, we numerically characterize quasihole anyonic statistics by applying a discretized version of the relation connecting the statistics of quasiholes in the lowest Landau level to the depletions they create in the density profile [E. Macaluso et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 266801 (2019)]. Our results give a direct proof of the anyonic statistics for quasiholes of fractional Chern insulators, starting from a realistic Hamiltonian. Moreover, they provide strong indications that this property can be experimentally probed through local density measurements, making our scheme readily applicable in state-of-the-art experiments with ultracold atoms and superconducting qubits.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据