4.2 Article

Fully consistent density functional theory determination of the insulator-metal transition boundary in warm dense hydrogen

期刊

PHYSICAL REVIEW RESEARCH
卷 2, 期 3, 页码 -

出版社

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevResearch.2.032065

关键词

-

资金

  1. Department of Energy National Nuclear Security Administration [DE-NA0003856]
  2. U.S. National Science Foundation PHY Grant [1802964]
  3. U.S. Dept. of Energy [DE-SC 0002139]
  4. agency of the U.S. Government
  5. Division Of Physics
  6. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien [1802964] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Using conceptually and procedurally consistent density functional theory (DFT) calculations with an advanced meta-generalized gradient approximation (GGA) exchange-correlation functional in ab initio Born-Oppenheimer molecular dynamics (BOMD) simulations, we determine the insulator-metal transition (IMT) of warm dense fluid hydrogen from 50 to 300 GPa to be in better agreement with experiment than previous DFT predictions. The inclusion of nuclear quantum effects via path-integral molecular dynamics (PIMD) sharpens the transition and lowers its temperature relative to the BOMD results. A rapid decrease in the molecular character of the system, as observed via the ionic pair correlation function, coincides with an abrupt conductivity increase, confirming a metallic transition due to molecular hydrogen dissociation that is coincident with abrupt band-gap closure. Comparison of the PIMD and BOMD results clearly demonstrates an isotope effect on the IMT. Exploitation of differing methodologies for using the orbital-dependent and deorbitalized versions of the meta-GGA enables us to quantify exchange-correlation approximation effects. Distinct from stochastic simulations, these results do not depend upon any clever but uncontrolled combination of ground-state and finite-T methodologies and should provide a reliable benchmark for further studies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据