4.2 Article

Fractonic Chern-Simons and BF theories

期刊

PHYSICAL REVIEW RESEARCH
卷 2, 期 2, 页码 -

出版社

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevResearch.2.023249

关键词

-

资金

  1. PCTS Fellowship at Princeton University
  2. NSF-DMR [1352271]
  3. Sloan Foundation [FG-2015-65927]
  4. National Science Foundation [PHY-1607611]
  5. Division Of Materials Research
  6. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien [1352271] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Fracton order is an intriguing new type of order which shares many common features with topological order, such as topology-dependent ground-state degeneracies, and excitations with mutual statistics. However, it also has several distinctive geometrical aspects, such as excitations with restricted mobility, which naturally lead to effective descriptions in terms of higher-rank gauge fields. In this paper, we investigate possible effective field theories for three-dimensional fracton order, by presenting a general philosophy whereby topological-like actions for such higher-rank gauge fields can be constructed. Our approach draws inspiration from Chern-Simons and BF theories in 2+1 dimensions, and imposes constraints binding higher-rank gauge charge to higher-rank gauge flux. We show that the resulting fractonic Chern-Simons and BF theories reproduce many of the interesting features of their familiar two-dimensional cousins. We analyze one example of the resulting fractonic Chern-Simons theory in detail, and show that upon quantization it realizes a gapped fracton order with quasiparticle excitations that are mobile only along a subset of one-dimensional lines, and display a form of fractional self-statistics. The ground-state degeneracy of this theory is both topology and geometry dependent, scaling exponentially with the linear system size when the model is placed on a three-dimensional torus. By studying the resulting quantum theory on the lattice, we show that it describes a Z(s) generalization of the Chamon code.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据