4.3 Article

In vitro and in vivo digestibility of pea and chickpea powder prepared by cooking and drying treatment

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FOOD PROPERTIES
卷 23, 期 1, 页码 1187-1199

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/10942912.2020.1792925

关键词

Pea and chickpea; cooking and drying treatment; in vitro and in vivo digestion

资金

  1. Hefei University Bioengineering Specialty Major [2018hfppzy04]
  2. Science and Technology Major Project in Anhui Prov [17030701015]
  3. Provincial Quality Engineering Project of Colleges [2017jyxm1179]
  4. Education and Training Plan for Bioengineering Outstanding Engineers [2018zygc039]
  5. Research on Construction Standards of Bioengineering Modular Specialty [2018jyxm]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The glycemic indices (GI) of pea and chickpea are normally lower than 60, which are commonly considered as middle or low GI foods. Different processing conditions would influence proportions of rapidly digestible starch (RDS), slowly digestible starch (SDS), and resistant starch (RS) in the processed pea and chickpea. In general, high-temperature cooking followed by high-temperature drying (HCHD) largely kept total starch (68.58% and 61.99% of dry matter in pea and chickpea, respectively), increased RDS (29.89% and 33.40% of total starch in pea and chickpea, respectively) and RS proportions (25.78% and 17.08% of total starch in pea and chickpea, respectively) while the opposite effect in pea and chickpea was observed. Glycemic response of panelists after consuming HCHD pea or chickpea would cause a faster increase of incremental plasma glucose concentration within 30 min, followed by a rapid decrease to baseline compared with the pea or chickpea processed by low-temperature cooking followed by lowtemperature drying (LCLD). The GI of HCHD pea and chickpea were 59.02 and 49.15, respectively, which were significantly higher than those processed by LCLD (pea: 32.63, chickpea: 31.91). Both in vitro and in vivo digestibility indicated that LCLD was more suitable to process pea and chickpea powder.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据