4.2 Article

Antioxidant and Antimicrobial Activity of Essential Oils and Phenolic Extracts from the Aerial Parts of Ruta montana L. of the Middle Atlas Mountains-Morocco

期刊

JOURNAL OF ESSENTIAL OIL BEARING PLANTS
卷 23, 期 5, 页码 902-917

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/0972060X.2020.1829995

关键词

Ruta montana L; 2-undecanone; antioxidant activity; Enterococcus faecium; Candida albicans

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This present study is a contribution to the phytochemical and biological valorization of essential oils and extracts of Ruta montana L., collected in the Boulemane region. The essential oils extracted by hydrodistillation yielded 1.60 +/- 0.08 % and their analysis by GC/MS made it possible to identify thirty-two components with the dominance of 2-undecanone (82.62 %), 2-undecanol (2.87 %) and 2-undecanol acetate (2.13 %). Phytochemical screening of aerial parts of Ruta montana L. revealed the presence of alkaloids, mucilages, triterpenes, sterols, flavonoids, leucoanthcyanes, gallic and catechin tannins, as well as combined anthracene derivatives. Phenolic compounds of Ruta montana were extracted by Soxhlet and by maceration with yields of 17.92 +/- 0.90 % and 11.03 +/- 0.55 % respectively. Quantitative analysis of total phenols and flavonoids showed that the hydromethanolic extract obtained by Soxhlet is very rich in total phenols (33.684 +/- 1.684 mg GAE/g extract) and flavonoids (0.843 +/- 0.042 mg QE/g extract). The antioxidant activity evaluated by the 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl test (DPPH), showed that essential oil has a high antioxidant potential of which IC50 = 548.5 +/- 27.4 mu g/ml. Antimicrobial testing of essential oils and extracts of R. montana was conducted on twenty-eight bacterial and twelve fungal strains. Essential oils showed strong antibacterial and antifungal activity. These results suggest that this species could be used economically as a valuable bioproduct with new functional properties in the food, cosmetics and pharmaceutical industries.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据