3.9 Article

Phytochemical analysis and in vitro cytostatic potential of ethnopharmacological important medicinal plants

期刊

TOXICOLOGY REPORTS
卷 7, 期 -, 页码 443-452

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.toxrep.2020.02.016

关键词

Annona reticulate; Euphorbia hirta; Hibiscus sabdariffa; Lablab purpureus; Moringa oleifera; Murraya koenigii

资金

  1. DST-SERB project [ECR2016/000079]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Annonareticulate (Mart.), Lablab purpureus (L.) Sweet, Murrayakoenigii (L.) Spreng, Moringaoleifera (Lam.), Hibiscussabdariffa (L.) and Euphorbiahirta (L.) are most commonly used medicinal plants by the traditional healers of Karbi Anglong district of Assam, India against different human ailments including cancer suspected cases. The proposed study includes field survey related to ethnomedicinal aspects of medicinal plants, phytochemical analysis, and evaluation of their cytostatic potential with the possible mode of action against Dalton's lymphoma (DL) cell line. The phytochemical analysis of all the plant's extract was studied using standard protocol. The cytotoxicity of the methanol extracts was determined by MTT reduction assay. The effect of the same extract was also tested for development of apoptosis features in DL cells using a fluorescence microscope and flowcytometry. The underlying mechanism closely associated with apoptotic cell death was also studied by measuring reactive oxygen species (ROS), mitochondrial membrane potential, and expression level of apoptosis inducing proteins. Murraya koenigii induced more apoptotic features in DL cells, followed by Annona reticulate. The decrease in mitochondrial membrane potential, release of cytochromec, increase in ROS level and higher expression of caspases (3 and 9) after plant extracts treatment may cause involvement of mitochondria in the process of apoptosis. From this study, it can be concluded that the plant species mainly Murraya koenigi and Annonareticulate significantly induced cytotoxicity in DL cells through apoptosis by utilizing mitochondrial pathway.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.9
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据