4.7 Article

The quaternary assembly of KRas4B with Raf-1 at the membrane

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.csbj.2020.03.018

关键词

Ras dimerization; Nanoclusters; KRAS; C-Raf; RBD; CRD; MAPK pathway; Anionic bilayer; Molecular dynamics

资金

  1. National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health [HHSN26120080001E]
  2. Intramural Research Program of the NIH, National Cancer Institute, Center for Cancer Research
  3. NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE [ZIABC010441, ZIABC010440, ZIABC010442] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Proximally located in the membrane, oncogenic Ras dimers (or nanoclusters) can recruit and promote Raf dimerization and MAPK (Raf/MEK/ERK) signaling. Among Ras isoforms, KRas4B is the most frequently mutated. Recent data on the binary KRas4B-Raf-1 complex suggested that Raf-1 CRD not only executes membrane anchorage, but also supports the high-affinity interaction of Raf-1 RBD with KRas4B catalytic domain. For a detailed mechanistic picture of Raf activation at the membrane, we employ explicit MD simulations of the quaternary KRas4B-Raf-1 complex. The complex contains two active GTP-bound KRas4B proteins forming a dimer through the allosteric lobe interface and two tandem RBD-CRD segments of Raf-1 interacting with the effector lobes at both ends of the KRas4B dimer. We show that Raf-1 RBD-CRD supports stable KRas4B dimer at preferred interface and orientation at the membrane, thereby cooperatively enhancing the affinity of the KRas4B-Raf-1 interaction. We propose that a Ras dimer at the membrane can increase the population of proximal Raf kinase domains, promoting kinase domain dimerization in the cytoplasm. Collectively, the dynamic Ras-Raf assembly promotes Raf activation not by allostery; instead, Ras activates Raf by shifting its ensemble toward kinase domain-accessible states through enhanced affinity at the membrane. (C) 2020 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of Research Network of Computational and Structural Biotechnology.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据