4.7 Article

Enhancing hydrogen-rich syngas production and energy recovery efficiency by integrating hydrothermal carbonization pretreatment with steam gasification

期刊

ENERGY
卷 210, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2020.118655

关键词

Biomass; Gasification; Hydrothermal carbonization; Kinetic analysis

资金

  1. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [BLX201936]
  2. Open Project of Key Laboratory of Environmental Biotechnology, CAS [kf2019003]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Steam gasification behavior and kinetics of hydrothermally treated low-lipid microalgae Nannochloropsis sp. were probed in this work. The roles of hydrothermal carbonization (HTC) parameters (HTC temperature, HTC reaction time) as well as gasification conditions (gasification temperature, S/B mass ratio) in modulating the properties of hydrothermal carbons (HCs) as well as gasification performance were elucidated. Experimental results indicated that the aromaticity of the HCs derived from Nannochloropsis sp. was promoted, whereas the polarity was lowered by the increased HTC temperature and reaction time. At optimum HTC conditions (HTC temperature of 180 degrees C, residence time of 12 h) and gasification conditions (gasification temperature of 900 degrees C, S/B mass ratio of 2), the total maximum energy recovery efficiency was as high as 1.59. Kinetic parameters for the major gaseous products during the steam gasification of raw microalgae and the two typical HCs (HC-180C-12 h and HC-220C-12 h) were further determined. Kinetic results verified that the gasification reactivity of HC-180C-12 h was greatly higher than other two feedstock, and H-2 formation was greatly promoted compared to the other two gaseous products. Overall, combining hydrothermal pretreatment and steam gasification in one step is a promising technology that could greatly promote hydrogen-rich syngas production and energy recovery efficiency from low-lipid microalgae. (C) 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据