4.6 Article

Epigenetic age of the pre-frontal cortex is associated with neuritic plaques, amyloid load, and Alzheimer's disease related cognitive functioning

期刊

AGING-US
卷 7, 期 12, 页码 1198-1211

出版社

IMPACT JOURNALS LLC
DOI: 10.18632/aging.100864

关键词

epigenetics; neuritic plaques; amyloids; cognitive functioning; memory; Alzheimer's disease; epigenetic clock; DNA methylation

资金

  1. NIH/NIA [5R01AG042511-02, 1U34AG051425-01]
  2. NIH/NINDS [T32NS048004]
  3. [P30AG10161]
  4. [R01AG17917]
  5. [RF1AG15819]
  6. [R01AG34374]
  7. [R01AG36042]
  8. [U01AG46152]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

There is an urgent need to develop molecular biomarkers of brain age in order to advance our understanding of age related neurodegeneration. Recently, we developed a highly accurate epigenetic biomarker of tissue age (known as epigenetic clock) which is based on DNA methylation levels. Here we use n=700 dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) samples from Caucasian subjects of the Religious Order Study and the Rush Memory and Aging Project to examine the association between epigenetic age and Alzheimer's disease (AD) related cognitive decline, and AD related neuropathological markers. Epigenetic age acceleration of DLPFC is correlated with several neuropathological measurements including diffuse plaques (r=0.12, p=0.0015), neuritic plaques (r=0.11, p=0.0036), and amyloid load (r=0.091, p=0.016). Further, it is associated with a decline in global cognitive functioning (beta=-0.500, p=0.009), episodic memory (beta=-0.411, p=0.009) and working memory (beta=-0.405, p=0.011) among individuals with AD. The neuropathological markers may mediate the association between epigenetic age and cognitive decline. Genetic complex trait analysis (GCTA) revealed that epigenetic age acceleration is heritable (h(2)=0.41) and has significant genetic correlations with diffuse plaques (r=0.24, p=0.010) and possibly working memory (r=-0.35, p=0.065). Overall, these results suggest that the epigenetic clock may lend itself as a molecular biomarker of brain age.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据