4.7 Article

The ecogenomics of dsDNA bacteriophages in feces of stabled and feral horses

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.csbj.2020.10.036

关键词

Intestinal viromes; dsDNA bacteriophages; Horse feces; Equus caballus; Bacteriophage metagenomics; Bacteriophage diversity

资金

  1. Russian Foundation for Basic Research, Russia (from the Ministry of Education and Science of Russian Federation) [18-29-13029]
  2. MRC [MR/L015080/1, MR/T030062/1]
  3. MRC [MR/L015080/1, MR/T030062/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The viromes of the mammalian lower gut were shown to be heavily dominated by bacteriophages; however, only for humans were the composition and intervariability of the bacteriophage communities studied in depth. Here we present an ecogenomics survey of dsDNA bacteriophage diversity in the feces of horses (Equus caballus), comparing two groups of stabled horses, and a further group of feral horses that were isolated on an island. Our results indicate that the dsDNA viromes of the horse feces feature higher richness than in human viromes, with more even distribution of genotypes. No over-represented phage genotypes, such as CrAssphage-related viruses found in humans, were identified. Additionally, many bacteriophage genus-level clusters were found to be present in all three geographically isolated populations. The diversity of the horse intestinal bacteriophages is severely undersampled, and so consequently only a minor fraction of the phage contigs could be linked with the bacteriophage genomes. Our study indicates that bacteriophage ecological parameters in the intestinal ecosystems in horses and humans differ significantly, leading them to shape their corresponding viromes in different ways. Therefore, the diversity and structure of the intestinal virome in different animal species needs to be experimentally studied. (C) 2020 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of Research Network of Computational and Structural Biotechnology.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据