3.8 Proceedings Paper

Flowability and compressive strength test on self compacting mortar using graphene oxide

期刊

MATERIALS TODAY-PROCEEDINGS
卷 33, 期 -, 页码 491-495

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.matpr.2020.05.067

关键词

Graphene oxide; Self compacting concrete; Scanning electron microscopy; Slump; Compressive strength

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In most of designing constructions, closely bundled reinforcement, concrete placing at the sub-aquatic phase are some of the challenging site conditions. Self compacting concrete has the potentiality to flow under its self-weight without exclusion of materials added. Self compacting concrete resulted in a reduction of strength due to porosity. High-performance self-compacting cement and concrete are urgently needed to satisfy the high-rise buildings, marine tunnel and cross-sea bridges. However, several restrictions on cementitious materials still have to be resolved. One of the best emerging technology, incorporating nano based materials like carbon nano tubes, nano silica and graphene oxide. The impact of including graphene oxide (GO) to solidify on its microstructure and mechanical properties were examined. Right now, fresh properties like flowability and hardened properties like compressive strength, split tensile strength were assessed on GO incorporated SCM. The result shows that the optimized content of GO was obtained to give the positive impact on self compacting concrete. At an early age, the compressive strength of GO incorporated SCC was low. However, it expanded with time and turned out to be increasing until 0.03% substitution level. The expansion of GO advances hydration, reduces pore volume, quickens crystallite development and makes the crystallites adjust, which gives the high performance self compacting concrete. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. Selection and Peer-review under responsibility of the scientific committee of the International Conference on Future Generation Functional Materials and Research 2020.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据