4.8 Article

Atom-by-Atom Evolution of the Same Ligand-Protected Au21, Au22, Au22Cd1, and Au24 Nanocluster Series

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY
卷 142, 期 48, 页码 20426-20433

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/jacs.0c09110

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Science Foundation (NSF) [DMR-1808675]
  2. NSF, CBET-CAREER program [1652694]
  3. Air Force Office of Scientific Research (AFOSR) [FA9550-17-1-0099]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Atom-by-atom manipulation on metal nanoclusters (NCs) has long been desired, as the resulting series of NCs can provide insightful understanding of how a single atom affects the structure and properties as well as the evolution with size. Here, we report crystallizations of Au-22(SAdm)(16) and Au22Cd1 (SAdm)(16) (SAdm = adamantanethiolate) which link up with Au-21(SAdm)(13) and Au-24(SAdm)(16) NCs and form an atom-by-atom evolving series protected by the same ligand. Structurally, Au-22(SAdm)(16) has an Au-3(SAdm)(4) surface motif which is longer than the Au-2(SAdm)(3) on Au-21(SAdm)(15), whereas Au22Cd1(SAdm)(16) lacks one staple Au atom compared to Au-24(SAdm)(16) and thus the surface structure is reconstructed. A single Cd atom triggers the structural transition from Au-22 with a 10-atom bioctahedral kernel to Au22Cd1 with a 13-atom cuboctahedral kernel, and correspondingly, the optical properties are dramatically changed. The photoexcited carrier lifetime demonstrates that the optical properties and excited state relaxation are highly sensitive at the single atom level. By contrast, little change in both ionization potential and electron affinity is found in this series of NCs by theoretical calculations, indicating the electronic properties are independent of adding a single atom in this series. The work provides a paradigm that the NCs with continuous metal atom numbers are accessible and crystallizable when meticulously designed, and the optical properties are more affected at the single atom level than the electronic properties.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据