3.8 Article

Screening Value of Timed Up and Go Test for Frailty and Low Physical Performance in Korean Older Population: The Korean Frailty and Aging Cohort Study (KFACS)

期刊

ANNALS OF GERIATRIC MEDICINE AND RESEARCH
卷 24, 期 4, 页码 259-266

出版社

KOREAN GERIATRIC SOC
DOI: 10.4235/agmr.20.0072

关键词

Frailty; Diagnosis; Screening; Korea; Physical performance

资金

  1. Ministry of Health & Welfare, Republic of Korea [HI15C3153]
  2. Korea Health Technology R&D Project through the Korean Health Industry Development Institute (KHIDI)
  3. Korean Geriatrics Society Research Challenge Award

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: We evaluated the validity of the Timed Up and Go test (TUG) to screen for physical frailty and low physical performance in a nationwide community-dwelling Korean older population. Methods: We used baseline records of 3,010 ambulatory participants with TUG data from the Korean Frailty Aging Cohort Study from 2016 to 2017. The population-specific distribution of TUG was assessed. Physical frailty was defined as >= 3 positive items in the 5-item Cardiovascular Health Study (CHS) frailty scale, and low physical performance was assessed as Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB) scores <= 9 (ranging from 0 to 12). Results: In men (n=1,429) and women (n=1,581), the mean TUG times were 10.3 +/- 2.7 seconds and 10.2 +/- 3.0 seconds, respectively. The cut-off TUG times for the worst quintile were 11.8 seconds in men and 12.5 seconds in women. The TUG time was correlated with both the CHS frailty scale score (standardized beta [B]=0.36, p<0.001) and SPPB total score (B=-0.22, p<0.001) in the linear regression analysis adjusted for age and sex. In the receiver operating characteristic analysis, the performance of TUG in identifying physical frailty, calculated as the area under the curve (AUC), was 0.87, while the AUC of TUG in identifying low physical performance according to SPPB was 0.86. Conclusion: In the Korean older population, TUG can be a simple measure to identify physical frailty and low physical performance so as to identify populations that may benefit from in-depth geriatric assessments.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据