4.7 Article

Bi2Se3@C Rod-like Architecture with Outstanding Electrochemical Properties in Lithium/Potassium-Ion Batteries

期刊

ACS APPLIED ENERGY MATERIALS
卷 3, 期 11, 页码 11073-11081

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsaem.0c02056

关键词

Bi2Se3; MOFs; LIBs; KIBs; electrochemical performance

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [52002101, 52072101, 51972088]
  2. Australian Research Council [DP150100018]
  3. Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province [LQ20E020006, LQ19E020005]
  4. China Scholarship Council (CSC)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Lithium-ion batteries (LIBs) and potassium-ion batteries (KIBs) have broad application prospects in the fields of small/medium-sized electronic products and large-scale energy storage. However, the fast and low reversible capacity decay, poor rate capacity, and slow charge storage kinetics severely affect their large-scale applications. In this work, a Bi2Se3@C rod-like architecture was synthesized through an in situ selenization method using metal-organic frameworks as the precursor. The micro/nanoporous carbon structure not only offers a stable matrix to ensure electrode integrity but also absorbs a large amount of Bi2Se3 changes during repeated lithiation/potassization processes. In addition, the porous structure frame prevents the agglomeration of Bi2Se3 nanoparticles with larger surface energy and shortens the diffusion path of ion transport, thereby improving the rate performance. Therefore, Bi2Se3 pC shows outstanding lithium/potassium storage properties when applied in lithium/potassium-ion batteries. The study of the electrochemical reaction mechanism shows that partial rhombohedral Bi2Se3 transformed into orthorhombic Bi2Se3 after cycling. Pseudocapacitance contribution promotes the enhancement of the specific capacity and rate properties of the Bi2Se3@C electrode. The excellent electrochemical performance of the Bi2Se3 pC micro/nanostructure shows that it has promising potential as lithium/potassium-ion battery anode materials.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据