4.5 Article

Catalytic Deuteration of C(sp2)-H Bonds of Substituted (Hetero)arenes in a Pt(II) CNN-Pincer Complex/2,2,2-Trifluoroethanol-d1 System: Effect of Substituents on the Reaction Rate and Selectivity

期刊

ORGANOMETALLICS
卷 39, 期 22, 页码 4102-4114

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.organomet.0c00652

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Science Foundation [CHE-1800089]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Thirty four (hetero)arene derivatives have been tested in catalytic H/D exchange reactions involving their C(sp(2))-H bonds and 2,2,2-trifluoroethanol-d(1) (TFE-d(1)) in the presence of the homogeneous Pt(II) complex 1 supported by a sulfonated CNN-pincer ligand at 80 degrees C. The 18 substrates, including one pharmaceutical (naproxen), that are stable in the presence of 1 and are active in the H/D exchange reaction have been characterized by their position-specific extent of deuteration and, in a number of cases, the reaction kinetic selectivity. For the most reactive substrates the extent of deuteration approaches the expected statistical distribution of the exchangeable H and D atoms: e.g., 67-69% for phenol after 23 h and 88% for indole beta-CH bonds after 45 min. For a few substrates (N,N-dimethylaniline, indole, nitrobenzene) the H/D exchange is highly position selective. No satisfactory correlation was found between the position-specific (meta, para) H/D exchange rate constants for X-monosubstituted benzenes and Hammett sigma(x) constants. This observation was proposed to be related to the concerted nature of the CH bond activation, the rate-determining CH bond oxidative addition at a Pt(II) center. A novel scale of Hammett sigma(M)(X) constants was introduced to characterize the reactivity of C(sp(2))-H bonds in transition-metal-mediated reactions. The experimentally determined position-specific Gibbs energies of activation of the H/D exchange in substituted benzenes meta and para positions) as well as in thiophene (alpha and beta positions) were matched satisfactorily using DFT calculations.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据