4.8 Article

Biodegradable Cationic Polycarbonates as Vaccine Adjuvants

期刊

ACS APPLIED MATERIALS & INTERFACES
卷 12, 期 47, 页码 52285-52297

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsami.0c09649

关键词

polymer adjuvants; biodegradable adjuvants; ovalbumin; vaccine nanocomplexes; cancer vaccine; immunization

资金

  1. Institute of Bioengineering and Nanotechnology (Biomedical Research Council, Agency for Science, Technology and Research, Singapore)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, biodegradable cationic polycarbonate and polylactide block copolymers were synthesized and successfully used as novel vaccine adjuvants to provide enhanced anticancer immunity. The polymers formed nanoparticles with the model vaccine, ovalbumin (OVA), and the immunostimulant toll-like receptor 3 agonist poly(I:C) (a synthetic analog of the double-stranded RNA). Higher uptake of poly(I:C) by the bone marrow-derived dendritic cells and macrophages and OVA by dendritic cells was observed when delivered using the polymer adjuvant. In vivo experiments showed that these nanoparticles remained longer in the subcutaneous injection site as compared to OVA alone and led to higher production of anti-OVA specific antibodies with prolonged immunostimulation. When OVA was combined with poly(I:C) that was either co-entrapped in the same particles or as separate particles, a comparable level of anti-OVA IgG1 antibodies and interleukin-6 (IL-6) was produced in mouse blood plasma, and a similar level of cytotoxic T lymphocyte (CTL) response in mice was stimulated as compared to OVA/Alum particles. Furthermore, tumor rejection in the mice that were vaccinated for 9 months with the formulations containing the polymer adjuvant was stronger than the other treatment groups without the polymer. Notably, the cationic polycarbonates were not associated with any adverse in vivo effects. Thus, these biodegradable polymers may be promising substitutes for aluminum-based adjuvants in vaccine formulations.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据