4.8 Article

Strongly Reducing (Diarylamino)benzene-Based Covalent Organic Framework for Metal-Free Visible Light Photocatalytic H2O2 Generation

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY
卷 142, 期 47, 页码 20107-20116

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/jacs.0c09684

关键词

-

资金

  1. Research Board of Ghent University [GOA010-17, BOF GOA2017000303]
  2. FWO [V427919N]
  3. FWO [PEGASUS]2 Marie Sklodowska-Curie grant [665501]
  4. Fund for Scientific Research Flanders (FWO) [12T3519N]
  5. Hercules Foundation [AKUL/13/21]
  6. Flemish Government, department EWI, via the Hermes Fund [AH.2016.134]
  7. VLAIO [HBC.2019.0110]
  8. Flemish Government
  9. European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation program [834134, 647755]
  10. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German Research Foundation) [EXC 2008-390540038, TH 1463/15-1]
  11. Research Foundation Flanders (FWO)
  12. Flemish Government, department EWI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Photocatalytic reduction of molecular oxygen is a promising route toward sustainable production of hydrogen peroxide (H2O2). This challenging process requires photoactive semiconductors enabling solar energy driven generation and separation of electrons and holes with high charge transfer kinetics. Covalent organic frameworks (COFs) are an emerging class of photoactive semiconductors, tunable at a molecular level for high charge carrier generation and transfer. Herein, we report two newly designed two-dimensional COFs based on a (diarylamino)benzene linker that form a Kagome (kgm) lattice and show strong visible light absorption. Their high crystallinity and large surface areas (up to 1165 m(2)center dot g(-1)) allow efficient charge transfer and diffusion. The diarylamine (donor) unit promotes strong reduction properties, enabling these COFs to efficiently reduce oxygen to form H2O2. Overall, the use of a metal-free, recyclable photocatalytic system allows efficient photocatalytic solar transformations.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据