4.6 Article

Structural Transition of the Methane-Ethane Mixture Hydrate in a Hydrate/Water/Hydrocarbon Three-Phase Coexistence System: Effect of Gas Concentration

期刊

ACS SUSTAINABLE CHEMISTRY & ENGINEERING
卷 8, 期 45, 页码 16924-16937

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acssuschemeng.0c06432

关键词

gas hydrate; methane-ethane mixture hydrate; structural transition; bridging cages; kinetics; formation energy; adsorption preference; molecular dynamics simulation

资金

  1. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) [18H01925]
  2. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [18H01925] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Hydrate formation of a natural gas mixture is fascinating. Whereas both pure methane and ethane form a structure I (sI) hydrate, their mixture may form a structure II (sII) hydrate at certain compositions. Here, we investigated the underlying mechanisms of the methane-ethane mixture hydrate structural transition using an sII-hydrate-water-hydrocarbon three-phase interface system. The results indicate that sII hydrate formation is a function of methane concentration with a maximum at a mole concentration of 83-90%. In contrast, a significant amount of the sI hydrate forms at concentrations below 75% or equal to 100%. In addition, we unveil the mechanism of the rarely discussed structure conversion from sII to sI. The 15-hedron (mainly 5(12)6(3)) cages, which may originate from both aqua and the 16-hedron (5(12)6(4)) cage transition, play a vital role as a transitional bridge in the conversion at the transition interface. Owing to the specific structure of 15-hedron cages, the 14-hedron (5(12)6(2)) cages can grow, and thus, the sI hydrate grows. Furthermore, the methane occupancy in the 14-hedron cages and the concentration for the energetically favorable formation of the sII structure were quantified based on the formation energies for hydrates with methane and ethane molecules trapped inside. We show that the adsorption preference of guest molecules at the interfaces or cages can be attributed to the difference between the formation energy prediction and the reaction process results. Our findings have both academic and engineering significance for sustainable chemistry related to flow assurance, gas separation, gas transportation, and natural hydrate development in reservoirs with mixed gas hydrate structures.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据