4.8 Article

Mercaptophenylboronic Acid-Activated Gold Nanoparticles as Nanoantibiotics against Multidrug-Resistant Bacteria

期刊

ACS APPLIED MATERIALS & INTERFACES
卷 12, 期 46, 页码 51148-51159

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsami.0c12597

关键词

gold nanoparticles; antibacterial activity; electrospun nanofibers; wound healing; mercaptophenylboronic acid; multidrug-resistant bacteria

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21761142006, 21535001, 81730051, 81673039]
  2. Shenzhen Science and Technology Program [KQTD20190929172743294]
  3. National Key R&D Program of China [2018YFA0902600]
  4. Chinese Academy of Sciences [QYZDJ-SSW-SLH039, 121D11KYSB20170026]
  5. Shenzhen Bay Laboratory [SZBL2019062801004]
  6. Tencent Foundation through the XPLORER PRIZE

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Multidrug-resistant (MDR) bacteria-induced infections are becoming challenging issues threatening human health and life. Current antibiotics can hardly tackle this problem. Herein, we present a strategy to prepare mercaptophenylboronic acid (MBA)-activated gold nanoparticles (Au NPs) as an antibacterial agent against MDR bacteria. Both Au NPs and MBA cannot serve as antibiotics. However, when MBA attaches on Au NPs, the Au_MBA NPs show potent antibacterial activities against Gram-positive MDR clinical isolates (e.g., MDR Staphyloccocus aureus, MDR S. aureus; MDR Staphyloccocus epidermidis, MDR S. epidermidis). Furthermore, Au_MBA NPs show an extremely high median lethal dose (LD50, i.v, 960 mg/kg), which is much higher than those of most of the clinically used antibiotics. As an application example, we dope Au_MBA NPs with electrospun poly(epsilon- caprolactone) (PCL)/gelatin nanofibrous membranes as wound dressings, which show striking ability to remedy S. aureus- or MDR S. aureus-infected full-thickness skin wounds on rats. Our study provides a novel strategy for treating MDR bacteria- infected wounds in a simple, low-cost, and efficient way, which holds promise for broad clinical applications.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据