4.5 Article

Mapping Fall Dormancy and Winter Injury in Tetraploid Alfalfa

期刊

CROP SCIENCE
卷 55, 期 5, 页码 1995-2011

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.2135/cropsci2014.12.0834

关键词

-

类别

资金

  1. USDA SDA-IFAFS [00-52100-9611]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) is a widely planted perennial forage crop. Fall dormancy is generally negatively correlated with winter injury in alfalfa. To understand the genetic basis of the two traits, we identified quantitative trait loci (QTL) controlling autumn growth and winter injury using a tetraploid alfalfa F-1 population. In total, 601 marker alleles were scored from 78 restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP), 123 simple-sequence repeat (SSR), and 48 single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) markers. Linkage maps were constructed for each parent separately. Both maps contained eight linkage groups (LGs), with a length of 898 cM for WISFAL-6 and 845 cM for ABI408. Using interval mapping, we identified 15 QTL from an across-environment analysis and 71 QTL within individual environments for autumn plant height; winter injury; and autumn shoot, crown, and root biomass across four Iowa environments. Of the 71 QTL, 42 were identified at 18 chromosomal locations that were identified in multiple environments for the same trait. Possible pleiotropic QTL that contributed to dry weight of shoot, crown, and taproot were found, which partially explained the observed genetic correlations between those traits. However, few QTL were related to both autumn plant height and winter injury, supporting the observation of no genetic correlation between the two traits in this study. These results indicated that the two traits could be manipulated independently and, possibly, efficiently improved using marker-assisted selection. Because most QTL identified in this study were mapped to intervals of at least 10 cM, validation and localization in additional populations is needed to facilitate application of marker-assisted selection.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据