4.7 Article

A Survey of Machine Learning Techniques Applied to Self-Organizing Cellular Networks

期刊

IEEE COMMUNICATIONS SURVEYS AND TUTORIALS
卷 19, 期 4, 页码 2392-2431

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/COMST.2017.2727878

关键词

Machine learning; self-organizing networks; cellular networks; 5G

资金

  1. DARE Project through the Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council U.K. Global Challenges Research Fund Allocation [EP/P028764/1]
  2. Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa, Brazil [304096/2013-0]
  3. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/P028764/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  4. EPSRC [EP/P028764/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this paper, a survey of the literature of the past 15 years involving machine learning (ML) algorithms applied to self-organizing cellular networks is performed. In order for future networks to overcome the current limitations and address the issues of current cellular systems, it is clear that more intelligence needs to be deployed so that a fully autonomous and flexible network can be enabled. This paper focuses on the learning perspective of self-organizing networks (SON) solutions and provides, not only an overview of the most common ML techniques encountered in cellular networks but also manages to classify each paper in terms of its learning solution, while also giving some examples. The authors also classify each paper in terms of its self-organizing use-case and discuss how each proposed solution performed. In addition, a comparison between the most commonly found ML algorithms in terms of certain SON metrics is performed and general guidelines on when to choose each ML algorithm for each SON function are proposed. Lastly, this paper also provides future research directions and new paradigms that the use of more robust and intelligent algorithms, together with data gathered by operators, can bring to the cellular networks domain and fully enable the concept of SON in the near future.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据