4.8 Article

Benchmarking and integrating genome-wide CRISPR off-target detection and prediction

期刊

NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH
卷 48, 期 20, 页码 11370-11379

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkaa930

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2017YFC0908500, 2016YFC1303205]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31970638, 61572361]
  3. Shanghai Natural Science Foundation Program [17ZR1449400]
  4. Shanghai Artificial Intelligence Technology Standard Project [19DZ2200900]
  5. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities
  6. NSF, China

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Systematic evaluation of genome-wide Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats (CRISPR) off-target profiles is a fundamental step for the successful application of the CRISPR system to clinical therapies. Many experimental techniques and in silico tools have been proposed for detecting and predicting genome-wide CRISPR off-target profiles. These techniques and took, however, have not been systematically benchmarked. A comprehensive benchmark study and an integrated strategy that takes advantage of the currently available tools to improve predictions of genome-wide CRISPR off-target profiles are needed. We focused on the specificity of the traditional CRISPR SpCas9 system for gene knockout. First, we benchmarked 10 available genome-wide off-target cleavage site (OTS) detection techniques with the published OTS detection datasets. Second, taking the datasets generated from OTS detection techniques as the benchmark datasets, we benchmarked 17 available in silico genome-wide OTS prediction tools to evaluate their genome-wide CRISPR off-target prediction performances. Finally, we present the first one-stop integrated Genome-Wide Off-target cleavage Search platform (1GWOS) that was specifically designed for the optimal genome-wide OTS prediction by integrating the available OTS prediction algorithms with an AdaBoost ensemble framework.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据