4.2 Article

Modeling Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy Using a Nerve-on-a-Chip Microphysiological System

期刊

出版社

SPEKTRUM AKADEMISCHER VERLAG-SPRINGER-VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.14573/altex.2001181

关键词

-

资金

  1. NIH [R42TR001270]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Organ-on-a-chip devices that mimic in vivo physiology have the potential to identify effects of chemical and drug exposure in early preclinical stages of drug development while relying less heavily on animal models. We designed a hydrogel rat nerve-on-a-chip (RNoaC) construct that promotes axon growth analogous to mature nerve anatomy and is the first 3D in vitro model to collect electrophysiological and histomorphic metrics to assess in vivo pathophysiology. Here we culture embryonic rat dorsal root ganglia (DRG) in the construct to demonstrate its potential to screen for implications of nerve dysfunction in chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN). RNoaC constructs containing DRG explants from E15 rat pups were exposed to the chemotherapeutics bortezomib, oxaliplatin, paclitaxel or vincristine for 7 days. Then, axons were electrically stimulated to collect nerve conduction velocity (NCV) and peak amplitude (AMP), which are clinical electrophysiological metrics indicative of healthy or diseased populations. All chemotherapeutics decreased NCV and AMP in a concentration-dependent manner. At high drug concentrations, NCV and AMP were 10-60% lower than control values. Histopathological analysis revealed hallmarks of peripheral neuropathy. IC50 values calculated from concentration-response curves indicate that the significant decrease in function occurred before a decrease in viability. Our data suggest that electrophysiology recordings collected from our RNoaC platform can closely track subtle pathological changes in nerve function. The ability to collect clinically relevant data from RNoaC suggests it can be an effective tool for in vitro preclinical screening for peripheral neuropathy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据