3.8 Review

Are anti-PD1 and anti-PD-L1 alike? The non-small-cell lung cancer paradigm

期刊

ONCOLOGY REVIEWS
卷 14, 期 2, 页码 135-143

出版社

PAGEPRESS PUBL
DOI: 10.4081/oncol.2020.490

关键词

Immune-checkpoint inhibitor; PD1; PD-L1; lung cancer; immune-related adverse events

类别

资金

  1. Roche
  2. Pfizer
  3. Seqirus
  4. AstraZeneca
  5. Novartis
  6. Bristol-Myers Squibb
  7. Sanofi
  8. Istituto Gentili
  9. Ipsen
  10. Boehringer-Ingelheim

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Anti-PD1 and anti-PD-L1 agents may have intrinsic and clinically relevant differences in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. By reviewing currently available indirect evidence on these agents for NSCLC treatment, highlighting possible inter- and intra-class dissimilarities, anti-PD1 agents showed a higher response rate and a better outcome when combined with chemotherapy for the first-line treatment of patients with squamous and PD-L1 low advanced NSCLC, as compared to anti-PD-L1 agents. Conversely, anti-PD-L1 agents were responsible for less severe adverse events (AEs), particularly, immune-related AEs. These differences could be explained by their different specific properties. Considering possible differences between anti-PD1 and anti-PD-L1 agents could be clinically relevant for treatment tailoring and inspiring new investigational approaches.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据