4.3 Article

Management of Distress in Patients with Cancer-Are We Doing the Right Thing?

期刊

ANNALS OF BEHAVIORAL MEDICINE
卷 54, 期 12, 页码 978-984

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/abm/kaaa091

关键词

Distress; Cancer; Screening; Implementation; Support; Case finding

资金

  1. Dutch Cancer Society [11839]
  2. National Cancer Institute of the National Institutes of Health [R01CA224918, R25 CA177553-06]
  3. Georgetown Lombardi Survivorship Research Initiative [P30CA051008]
  4. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention of the Department of Health and Human Services [U01OH011690]
  5. American Cancer Society [RSG-15-021-01-CPPB]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background Screening for distress and referral for the provision of psychosocial care is currently the preferred approach to the management of distress in patients with cancer. To date, this approach has shown a limited effect on the reduction of distress. Recent commentaries have argued that the implementation of distress screening should be improved. On the other hand, the underlying assumption that a referral for psychosocial care is required for distressed patients can be questioned. This has led to the development of an alternative approach, called emotional support and case finding. Purpose In the context of finding innovative solutions to tomorrow's health challenges, we explore ways to optimize distress management in patients with cancer. Methods and Results We discuss three different approaches: (i) optimization of screening and referral, (ii) provision of emotional support and case finding, and (iii) a hybrid approach with multiple assessments, using mobile technology. Conclusions We suggest continued research on the screening and referral approach, to broaden the evidence-base on improving emotional support and case finding, and to evaluate the utility of multiple assessments of distress with new interactive mobile tools. Lessons learned from these efforts can be applied to other disease areas, such as cardiovascular disease or diabetes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据