4.3 Article

Rainfall-induced landslide susceptibility assessment using random forest weight at basin scale

期刊

HYDROLOGY RESEARCH
卷 49, 期 5, 页码 1363-1378

出版社

IWA PUBLISHING
DOI: 10.2166/nh.2017.044

关键词

Dongjiang River basin; objective weight; rainfall-induced landslide; random forest; susceptibility assessment

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [91547202, 51479216, 51579105, 51210013]
  2. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2017M612662]
  3. Chinese Academy of Engineering Consulting Project [2015-ZD-07-04-03]
  4. Public Welfare Project of Ministry of Water Resources [200901043-03]
  5. Project for Creative Research from Guangdong Water Resources Department [2016-07, 2016-01]
  6. Research program of Guangzhou Water Authority

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Rainfall-induced landslide susceptibility assessment is currently considered an effective tool for landslide hazard assessment as well as for appropriate warning and forecasting. As part of the assessment procedure, a credible index weight matrix can strongly increase the rationality of the assessment result. This study proposed a novel weight-determining method by using random forests (RFs) to find a suitable weight. Random forest weights (RFWs) and eight indexes were used to construct an assessment model of the Dongjiang River basin based on fuzzy comprehensive evaluation. The results show that RF identified the elevation (EL) and slope angle (SL) as the two most important indexes, and soil erodibility factor (SEF) and shear resistance capacity (SRC) as the two least important indexes. The assessment accuracy of RFW can be as high as 79.71%, which is higher than the entropy weight (EW) of 63.77%. Two experiments were conducted by respectively removing the most dominant and the weakest indexes to examine the rationality and feasibility of RFW; both precision validation and contrastive analysis indicated the assessment results of RFW to be reasonable and satisfactory. The initial application of RF for weight determination shows significant potential and the use of RFW is therefore recommended.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据