4.1 Article

Performance Trajectories for Competitive Swimmers: The Role of Coach Interpersonal Behaviors and Athlete Motivation

期刊

MOTIVATION SCIENCE
卷 6, 期 3, 页码 285-296

出版社

EDUCATIONAL PUBLISHING FOUNDATION-AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSOC
DOI: 10.1037/mot0000156

关键词

self-determination; sport; performance; trajectories

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigated the longitudinal trajectories of athletes' competitive performance results, as well as the motivational predictors of the emerging trajectories. In 2010, a group of 413 competitive swimmers were asked to provide background characteristics (age, gender, years of experience) and complete self-determination theory-based measures of their coaches' interpersonal behaviors and sport motivation. The athletes' performances were then followed for seven swimming seasons (2011-2017) and their top score from each season was used to track their trajectories over time. The data were analyzed using latent class growth analysis to determine the best-fitting model of performance trajectories, while controlling for athletes' background characteristics. Athletes' perceptions of coaches' behaviors and their motivation were explored as predictors using a multinomial logistic regression. The analyses revealed 5 latent classes: Early Dropout (23%) Delayed Dropout (40%), Stable (9%), Improvement (18%), and High-Performance (11%). Multinomial logistic regression analysis indicated that, in 2010, members of the Improvement and High-Performance classes reported higher perceived autonomy support (ORs >1.58, CI95s > 1.00) and relatedness support (ORs > 1.58, CI95s > 1.00) than the Early Dropout and Delayed Dropout groups. The Stable, Improvement, and High-Performance groups reported less non-self-determined motivation in 2010 than the Early Dropout and Delayed Dropout Groups (ORs < .43, CI95s < 1.00). These results support that perceptions of coaches' interpersonal behaviors and athletes' motivation predict performance trajectories among swimmers over time.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据