4.1 Review

Long-term antipsychotic use and brain changes in schizophrenia - a systematic review and meta-analysis

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/hup.2574

关键词

adverse effect; aetiology; brain; follow-up; MRI; psychotic disorders

资金

  1. Sigrid Juselius foundation
  2. Oy H Lundbeck Ab
  3. Academy of Finland [268336, 278286]
  4. Jalmari and Rauha Ahokas foundation
  5. Brain & Behavior Research Foundation
  6. Northern Finland Health Care Support Foundation
  7. Academy of Finland (AKA) [268336, 268336, 278286, 278286] Funding Source: Academy of Finland (AKA)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective The association between long-term antipsychotic treatment and changes in brain structure in schizophrenia is unclear. Our aim was to conduct a systematic review and a meta-analysis on long-term antipsychotic effects on brain structures in schizophrenia focusing on studies with at least 2 years of follow-up between MRI scans. Design Studies were systematically collected using 4 databases, and we also contacted authors for unpublished data. We calculated correlations between antipsychotic dose and/or type and brain volumetric changes and used random effect meta-analysis to study correlations by brain area. Results Thirty-one publications from 16 samples fulfilled our inclusion criteria. In meta-analysis, higher antipsychotic exposure associated statistically significantly with parietal lobe decrease (studies, n = 4; r = -.14, p = .013) and with basal ganglia increase (n = 4; r = .10, p = .044). Most of the reported correlations in the original studies were statistically nonsignificant. There were no clear differences between typical and atypical exposure and brain volume change. The studies were often small and highly heterogeneous in their methods and seldom focused on antipsychotic medication and brain changes as the main subject. Conclusions Antipsychotic medication may associate with brain structure changes. More long-term follow-up studies taking into account illness severity measures are needed to make definitive conclusions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据