4.0 Article

Fluorescent macrolide probes - synthesis and use in evaluation of bacterial resistance

期刊

RSC CHEMICAL BIOLOGY
卷 1, 期 5, 页码 395-404

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d0cb00118j

关键词

-

资金

  1. Australian Postgraduate Award
  2. Institute for Molecular Biosciences Research Advancement Award
  3. MRC Proximity to Discovery EXCITEME2 grant [MCPC17189]
  4. Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation Marine Microbiology Initiative grant [GBMF5514]
  5. Campus France the Programme Hubert Curien FASIC [41621QL]
  6. Wellcome Trust [WT1104797/Z/14/Z]
  7. NHMRC [APP1113719]
  8. ACRF
  9. QUEX award
  10. MRC [MC_PC_17189] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The emerging crisis of antibiotic resistance requires a multi-pronged approach in order to avert the onset of a post-antibiotic age. Studies of antibiotic uptake and localisation in live cells may inform the design of improved drugs and help develop a better understanding of bacterial resistance and persistence. To facilitate this research, we have synthesised fluorescent derivatives of the macrolide antibiotic erythromycin. These analogues exhibit a similar spectrum of antibiotic activity to the parent drug and are capable of labelling both Gram-positive and -negative bacteria for microscopy. The probes localise intracellularly, with uptake in Gram-negative bacteria dependent on the level of efflux pump activity. A plate-based assay established to quantify bacterial labelling and localisation demonstrated that the probes were taken up by both susceptible and resistant bacteria. Significant intra-strain and -species differences were observed in these preliminary studies. In order to examine uptake in real-time, the probe was used in single-cell microfluidic microscopy, revealing previously unseen heterogeneity of uptake in populations of susceptible bacteria. These studies illustrate the potential of fluorescent macrolide probes to characterise and explore drug uptake and efflux in bacteria.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据