4.5 Article

Sialic acid deficiency is associated with oxidative stress leading to muscle atrophy and weakness in GNE myopathy

期刊

HUMAN MOLECULAR GENETICS
卷 26, 期 16, 页码 3081-3093

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/hmg/ddx192

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Center of Neurology and Psychiatry [29-4, 28-6]
  2. Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development, AMED [16dk0310072h0001]
  3. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) KAKENHI [JP15H04846]
  4. NHGRI of the National Institutes of Health, USA
  5. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [15H04846] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Sialic acids are monosaccharides found in terminal sugar chains of cell surfaces and proteins; they have various biological functions and have been implicated in health and disease. Genetic defects of the GNE gene which encodes a critical bifunctional enzyme for sialic acid biosynthesis, lead to GNE myopathy, a disease manifesting with progressive muscle atrophy and weakness. The likely mechanism of disease is a lack of sialic acids. There remains, however, an unexplained link between hyposialylation and the muscle atrophy and weakness. In this study, we found that muscle proteins were highly modified by S-nitrosylation, and that oxidative stress-responsive genes were significantly upregulated, in hyposialylated muscles from human GNE myopathy patients and model mice. In both in vitro and in vivo models, the production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) was elevated with cellular hyposialylation, and increasing overall sialylation by extrinsic sialic acid intake reduced ROS and protein S-nitrosylation. More importantly, the antioxidant, oral N-acetylcysteine led to amelioration of the muscle atrophy and weakness in Gne mutant mice. Our data provide evidence of additional important function of sialic acids as a ROS scavenger in skeletal muscles, expanding our understanding on how sialic acid deficiency contributes to disease pathology, and identify oxidative stress as a therapeutic target in GNE myopathy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据