4.3 Article

Prognostic significance of postoperative complication after curative resection for patients with gastric cancer

期刊

JOURNAL OF CANCER RESEARCH AND THERAPEUTICS
卷 16, 期 7, 页码 1611-1616

出版社

WOLTERS KLUWER MEDKNOW PUBLICATIONS
DOI: 10.4103/jcrt.JCRT_856_19

关键词

Clavien-Dindo severity classification; curative gastrectomy; gastric cancer; postoperative complication; prognosis

类别

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81802313]
  2. Shanghai Hospital Development Center [16CR2022A]
  3. Shanghai Municipal Commission of Health and Family Planning [2017BR043]
  4. Shanghai Sailing Program [17YF1415700]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purposes: To investigate the impact of postoperative complication on long-term survival in gastric cancer patients after curative resection. Methods: A total 663 gastric cancer patients undergoing potentially curative resection during January 2010 to November 2014 were studied. Complications were classified according to the Clavien-Dindo severity classification. Results: Postoperative complications occurred in 138 of 663 cases (20.8%). Multivariate analysis identified >65 years old (P = 0.001), male (P = 0.035), and total gastrectomy (P = 0.037) as independent risk factors for postoperative complications. The 5-year overall survival rate was 48.7% in the no complication group, which was significantly better than that in the complication group (42.7%, P = 0.01). Further stratified analysis by cancer staging revealed that decline in 5-year overall survival due to postoperative complication existed among stage I (P = 0.032), II (P = 0.041), and III (P = 0.001) patients. Cox proportional hazards model showed that increasing pT (P = 0.013) and pN (P = 0.001) grade, advanced pTNM (P = 0.001) stage, total gastrectomy (P = 0.001), and postoperative complication (P = 0.006) were independent prognostic factors. Conclusion: Postoperative complications have a significant negative impact on the long-term survival in gastric cancer patients even if the tumor is resected curatively.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据