4.5 Article

Ciliogenesis and cell cycle alterations contribute to KIF2A-related malformations of cortical development

期刊

HUMAN MOLECULAR GENETICS
卷 27, 期 2, 页码 224-238

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/hmg/ddx384

关键词

-

资金

  1. Strasbourg University
  2. Agence Nationale de la Recherche [ANR-10-LABX-0030-INRT, ANR-10-IDEX-0002-02]
  3. Fondation pour la Recherche Medicale (FRM ) [J.C-DEQ20130326477]
  4. Fondation Maladies Rares
  5. Fondation NRJ-Institut de France, Agence National de Recherche [ANR 15-CE16-0018-01, E10107KP, ANR-13-BSV-0009-01]
  6. European Union DESIRE [602531]
  7. French Agence National de la Recherche [ANR-13-BSV4-0008-01]
  8. JTC Neurodevelopmental Disorders [NEURON8-Full-815-006 STEM-MCD]
  9. Inserm
  10. CNRS
  11. UPMC
  12. Fondation Bettencourt Schueller
  13. Federation pour la Recherche sur le cerveau (FRC)
  14. Ile de France region
  15. FRC Rotary

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Genetic findings reported by our group and others showed that de novo missense variants in the KIF2A gene underlie malformations of brain development called pachygyria and microcephaly. Though KIF2A is known as member of the Kinesin-13 family involved in the regulation of microtubule end dynamics through its ATP dependent MT-depolymerase activity, how KIF2A variants lead to brain malformations is still largely unknown. Using cellular and in utero electroporation approaches, we show here that KIF2A disease-causing variants disrupts projection neuron positioning and interneuron migration, as well as progenitors proliferation. Interestingly, further dissection of this latter process revealed that ciliogenesis regulation is also altered during progenitors cell cycle. Altogether, our data suggest that deregulation of the coupling between ciliogenesis and cell cycle might contribute to the pathogenesis of KIF2A-related brain malformations. They also raise the issue whether ciliogenesis defects are a hallmark of other brain malformations, such as those related to tubulins and MT-motor proteins variants.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据