4.5 Article

MeCP2_E1 N-terminal modifications affect its degradation rate and are disrupted by the Ala2Val Rett mutation

期刊

HUMAN MOLECULAR GENETICS
卷 26, 期 21, 页码 4132-4141

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/hmg/ddx300

关键词

-

资金

  1. Ontario Rett Syndrome Association (ORSA)
  2. Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) [MOP 130417]
  3. Dalton Whitebread Scholarship Fund, University of Toronto open fellowship
  4. Margaret and Howard Gamble Research Grant

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Methyl CpG-binding protein 2 (MeCP2), the mutated protein in Rett syndrome (RTT), is a crucial chromatin-modifying and gene-regulatory protein that has two main isoforms (MeCP2_E1 and MeCP2_E2) due to the alternative splicing and switching between translation start codons in exons one and two. Functionally, these two isoforms appear to be virtually identical; however, evidence suggests that only MeCP2_E1 is relevant to RTT, including a single RTT missense mutation in exon 1, Ala2Val. Here, we show that N-terminal co- and post-translational modifications differ for MeCP2_E1 and MeCP2_E1-Ala2Val, which result in different protein degradation rates in vitro. We report complete N-methionine excision (NME) for MeCP2_E1 and evidence of excision of multiple alanine residues from the N-terminal polyalanine stretch. For MeCP2_E1-Ala2Val, we observed only partial NME and N-acetylation (NA) of either methionine or valine. The localization of MeCP2_E1 and co-localization with chromatin appear to be unaffected by the Ala2Val mutation. However, a higher proteasomal degradation rate was observed for MeCP2_E1-Ala2Val compared with that for wild type MeCP2_E1. Thus, the etiopathology of Ala2Val is likely due to a reduced bio-availability of MeCP2 because of the faster degradation rate of the unmodified defective protein. Our data on the effects of the Ala2Val mutation on N-terminal modifications of MeCP2 may be applicable to Ala2Val mutations in other disease genes for which no etiopathological mechanism has been established.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据